Thursday, August 23, 2007

Learning to be creative in strategy by being creative in the learning of strategy

Bethany Dalton-Kash (www.alexkash.com/bethanyart.html)


A group of 16 MBA students at the Graduate School of Business, Cape Town, elected to do a self-designed and evaluated course in “Strategy, design and creativity”. The elective is described as a master class for MBAs who have completed all MBA core courses, yet is essentially a ‘social learning experiment’, comprised of presumably intelligent and driven adults.


The process of emergence: From chaos to order MBA learning typically engages deductive, left brain cognitive processes. The MBA ‘Strategy, design and creativity’ elective allows students the opportunity to develop a deeper awareness and understanding of emergent, inductive learning processes. Ironically, even though most of life’s learning is emergent, this journey was new for many.

www.cartoonstock.com/directory/e/emergence.asp

Each student had unique expectations based on their understanding of:
· The terms ‘Strategy’, ‘Creativity’ and ‘Design’ and how these elements relate to each other
· The most effective learning methodology in this context. (Some sought to undergo an experiential awakening of their own creativity whilst others preferred an observer’s inquiry into other’s creative processes. And in this way, better understand how to manage creative people and/or innovation processes within organisations)

cgda.nic.in/.../H%20R%20D/Team%20Building.htm

Levels of awareness/ consciousness of ‘the self’, ‘the group’ and the ’process’ were initially very diverse. All students questioned their own right brain cognitive development, and what they could contribute to the group. In grappling with the process, some reacted to ‘working in the dark’ by imposing their views/parameters or opting for avoidance behaviour. These reactions presented an opportunity for boundaries within the group to be established.

As ‘the mist’ cleared, some saw that: in a creative process, elements move from a state of disparity into a merging of combined elements of similar substance. In the same way, members of the class moved through the ‘chasm of chaos’ by forming cliques with people of similar views and levels of insight. By drawing understanding and security form each other, cohesion and order started to develop.

Some students were able to perceive the ambiguity of being both an element within a creative process, and yet also an artist who, through collaboration, can create order from chaos, and thus purpose through process, and meaning from intention.

http://8ight.stumbleupon.com/tag/emergence/


It became apparent that rigid mental models inhibited us from truly listening to each other. Also, that effective communication demanded practise skill over the use of words and language to convey meaning to others. We practiced listening and questioning techniques and started to learn communication methods that empower ‘the other’ instead of just gratifying the self. This helped the interview technique and enhanced the interviewee’s experience of engaging with the class.

Richard Seel (http://www.new-paradigm.co.uk/culture-complex.htm)Figure 2—Emergent process: a system of diverse agents (A), richly connected (B), gives rise to an emergent pattern (C), which feeds back down into the system (D)


Common Vision: Learning methodology The community decided on a double-loop leaning methodology that investigated the boundary question, “What fundamental patterns
(tacit and hidden), beliefs, characteristics and behaviours, tend to enable productive creative outcomes?”
Mini-groups will make sense of their interviews by using systems thinking methods. It is hoped that a theory may emerge through our subsequent analyses of 'the basket' of casual loop diagrams. The robustness of our theory will then be tested in our next university module in October.

During this interview and analysis process, this blog has been created in order to invite a greater community of ideas into this realm of experimentation and discovery. Each week, a new topic of discussion will be posted and we look forward to engaging in dynamic debate with people from across the globe.

Our questions: What factors are necessary to influence/facilitate the creativity process? Is it necessary to implement boundaries initially and do these boundaries become more rigid and prevalent as the the process of creativity proceeds?

5 comments:

Bogartthesmelly said...

You okes are taking this way too seriously, you need to drink more beer. That is my thoughtful and well reasoned comment for today. Should you require my rationale and perhaps a few references for you own edification, please refer yourselves to my cell phone number...which I'm not going to hand out...Seriously, looks like you okes are well down the road toward new stuff, which we all know is hard to come by, so well done. Just make sure you don't go too far or run out of breadcrumbs...

Creategist said...

Hey - good stuff - well done on a great blog

Anonymous said...

The challenge as I experience it every dasy is that more and more people believe they are "creative". While this may be the case, why hire specialists? Clients hire agencies, production companies, designers and strategists and in the end enforce their views on the end results destroying the enitre process. This has nothing to do with communication, and everyhting to do with ego and justification. I always use this comparison: When people go to the dentist they don't take a mirror and have a discussion as to how to fix a cavity. They trust that the dentist knows what to do and leaves him to it. Yet clients hire creative media solutions companies and then tell them how they think the job should be done, executed and what the results will be. What's the point of that? Then they may as well do it all themselves.

Anonymous said...

Good show! From another angle (and in terms of 'practical application') : Is
creativity fixed, or can it be enhanced by environmental stimulation (e.g.
learning) and demands? (A model of neural plasticity rather than a general
measure of potentials and limitations?) Kobus Opperman
www.facilitation.co.za

Unknown said...

Shew, quite a lot of angles in this blog, the mind boggles down a multitude of divergent paths. I'm sure you're all in for an interesting emergent process!

What factors are necessary to influence/facilitate the creativity process? I find myself wondering if implied in this question is "within our organizations?" And also, organisationally, to what end it is that we believe we want to facilitate creativity? (Which incidentally I think is a great idea)

On a personal creative level, I've found that time is fabulous for stimulating creativity. I recently went to the Karoo for a holiday, to take some time out of the hectic rush. I had so many ideas come flooding in. They were sitting there in the back of my mind all the time I'm sure, but it was only when I had space for reflection that they emerged. Similarly in organisations, I believe we spend a lot of focus on "doing-doing-doing", and hardly any on reflection. Whilst working for the Innovation department of a large global beverage company, I participated in a facilitated workshop to come up with new beverage ideas. Most of the participants were wonderfully creative people who spent almost all of their time on deadline. When we came together, away from the office, with the intention of finding ideas, it was amazing what was latent. Playing in the space for this kind of emergent thinking was a really mind-blowing experience, which many of us had not had before. Initially there is a resistance to exploring the frontiers of the unknown, because organisationally speaking, we're usually functioning left-brainedly: analysing everything and critiquing it. To this extent, the structure of a place in which to play, is really helpful. A lot of us don't know how to play. Drawing or writing is something we last did in school.

I think another of the factors necessary is to switch off the Critic for enough time to let ideas surface. Once this phase of imagination is over, then the Critic becomes useful again in selecting what is doable and convertible into reality and what is not.

I think structure is very helpful also in the implementation stage. A lot of creatives are perceived as woolley because they lack follow through. A successful creative will have both imagination and then convert their ideas into reality. So from the perspective of 'do the boundaries become more rigid as the process continues?' - I think yes. Once we've had the amazing book idea, we need the structure and discipline to come and sit down and write it. Or turn up at the easel, even when we feel like there's no inspiration, so that we give it the space to emerge.

Some good resource books on Creativity are: Drawing on the Righthand side of the Brain by Betty Edwards. Also, On Becoming a Writer by Doris Corti.

Have fun y'all MBAs!